Going Off Track, Hurts You & Your Clients

Going Off TrackSitting at the first Manic Street Preachers concert in Vancouver in 10 years, I began musing about all the people who came to the show so many years on, to show their continuing support of the band. We waited in line for the doors to open, then we waited for another two hours until 10pm for the band to get on stage, but when they started playing, it was a new flavour and it took many a song before any of the 90s classics were sung. This got me thinking.

Over the 10 year absence on the Vancouver stage, the band would not doubt have gone through an evolution. This is to be expected, but if their performance was so foreign to what they used to be, is that not forgetting about the people who supported them all those years ago? How many people walked out of that concert feeling bittersweet, going home to play some of those old records because their expectations were not met?

One for All, All for Me?

Remember those first few major clients that catapulted your company in the right direction with that major case study that featured your strengths or the solid reviews that drove more business?

How often in business are those first clients put into the legacy client pile and considered ‘small’, whereas once they were ‘the client to please’? I guess the key question here becomes whether your company is to your legacy clients what it once was or are they scratching their heads wondering whatever happened to that company they supported in the early days?

The same can be said for employees. Companies that uphold core values that have been developed upon fundamental principles are rare. Having said that, employees that work towards a common goal in which they believe, are arguably just as rare. Today it seems that to an increasingly large number of people, a job is just that, a job, work, a daily grind.

Are you recognising the people in your organisation that continue to oil the cogs and keep the machine running smoothly? Too quickly do we forget how intricately our success is interwoven with the support of our clients; the demand for our service offering and the service delivered by the people who deal directly with our clients. This can be said of a rock band that relies on its fans, as much as it applies to a company whose offering is built on the collective intellectual property of the people who work there.

So, no matter how much your company evolves and grows over the years, do not lose sight of the type of company you strove to be to your clients and your employees in those early days, when you had everything to lose. Financial success has this tendency to take the ‘we’ out of the achievement and focus solely on the ‘I’. Well, you didn’t get to the top alone and the faster you recognise this, the sooner you will be a better company, boss or colleague to the people around you.

  • Share/Bookmark

Breaking the Search Marketing Silo

In 1886 John Wanamaker coined the phrase that would define traditional marketing:

“I know that 50% of my advertising is wasted…
…I just don’t know which half!”

Then in 2000, search marketing made its official debut with the launch of Google AdWords. This redefined the marketing game, as Pay-per-Click (PPC) gave rise to a measurable form of consumer-initiated pull marketing. Not only was the consumer driving the interaction with the advertiser but also each level of the online touch point was highly measurable. Oh, and it was cheap. Back in the day when AdWords hit the market it was dirt-cheap with bids starting at 0.05 cents. This ability to so precisely target a market, deliver a highly relevant ad message initiated by the ad target and then accurately measure the resultant interactivity was to the traditional marketing world a panacea to all those campaigns that had previously gone into the 50/50 pool.

So what did traditional marketing do? It gave search marketing its own budget, its own department, its own staff and they watched with glee as their cash cow grew. Slowly, as the years rolled by, search marketing continued to outgrow all other forms of marketing, bringing in ROAS and ROI figures with which traditional marketing could not hope to compete. This continued to make search marketing more independent, more isolated, more siloed.

Online marketing also evolved and what may initially have started with banner advertising and PPC expanded to user-generated content, online video, blogging, social networks, podcasts, widgets and mobile marketing, just to highlight a few. Thus, increasingly, ‘search marketing’ did its own thing while ‘traditional marketing’ continued business as usual.

Old Barriers Meet New Barriers

The rocky relationship between sales and marketing has been well documented in the last decade. BusinessWeek online describes this in an aptly titled article -  Sales and Marketing: Lost in a Thorny Forest The title follows to say: Our survey is in, and its picture of divided and dysfunctional efforts to achieve cooperation is fascinating, surprising and – a little sad

The almost rehearsed divisions between sales and marketing attitudes unfold:

Marketers see themselves as vastly underappreciated, and they regard sales teams as self-serving and short-sighted. Meanwhile, sales teams see themselves as indispensable, and they look upon marketers as ivory-tower strategists out of touch with the real world’s pressing demand of generating revenue.

Diagrammatically we can illustrate the sales & marketing relationship as follows:

Sales & Traditional Marketing Clash

The clashes are frequent, barriers to communication are embedded in the misconceptions held by each party and attempts to communicate often result in miscommunication, even open altercations. But while sales & marketing battles it out, what is happening to search marketing?

While in traditional marketing there is a fundamental understanding of integrated marketing communication, there appears to be a significant disconnect in integration between traditional marketing channels and search marketing. The examples vary, from a company advertising an online promotion omitting to place their website address in the TV ad, to no mention being made in online promotions of offers redeemable offline. Sometimes the online messaging diverges so greatly from the offline offer that it becomes difficult to recognise that it is the same brand being represented. A significant benefit of search marketing is the opportunity to track offline & online interaction and the ability to see the resultant website traffic just after a direct mail piece or e-mail campaign has been implemented. However, cross-channel communication is required to reap these benefits.

As much as sales & traditional marketing have a feisty relationship, at least there is one to speak of! Between traditional marketing and search marketing there appears to be very little interaction. A potential illustration of this relationship is represented below:

Search Marketing Silo Where sales and traditional marketing may make some headway, search marketing is completely out of the loop. Often it appears that search marketing and traditional marketing efforts are run by different departments and different people that barely know of the others’ existence.

What people seem to have forgotten is that ‘search marketing’ is in fact another form of marketing – it is an additional channel to the existing ‘offline’ marketing repertoire of print, TV, radio, outdoor etc. Search marketing should then be integrated into the offline channels much in the same way that these offline channels are integrated with one another. So, instead of creating another division, it might be wiser for marketing to reign in the search marketing team and create in them an ally against those pesky sales people.

  • Share/Bookmark

How Important is this ‘Twitter’?

Representing TwitterRemember when all your friends were jumping on the Facebook bandwagon but you resolutely held your ground until the nagging became unbearable? With a sense of resignation and personal betrayal for losing the battle, you joined the hordes of millions and decided to “re-befriend” the long lost friends of school with whom you have had absolutely zero contact for years, in order not to look like the only loser on Facebook with 5 friends.

Time has passed and you’ve made your peace with Facebook only for yet another social media networking tool to hit the market. This one’s called Twitter and it has been around for a while. It has reached the point of popular adoption, with a growth rate of over 1,382% between February 2008 – February 2009.

This time, it’s not really about your friends but rather the act of ‘following’ people, some of whom you have met but the majority of which who are industry thought leaders, celebrities or quite simply complete strangers. So, you ‘follow’ these people and in the interim read their 140 character messages that appear in real-time, whilst sharing your own 140 character tips, thoughts, news, gems of wisdom, arbitrary daily occurrences, personal schedule, interesting links, emotions, traffic reports, industry events etc. all in the hope that someone will ‘follow’ you. Again, ‘less is more’ is not a common mantra seen on Twitter. One of the goals appears to be to collect ‘followers’ and if you’re Ashton Kutcher, once you reach a million followers, Oprah will cover the story. So, as you can see, this ‘followers’ thing is a pretty big deal.

So, do you really need to be on Twitter?

It’s All Relative

If you work for Zappos, Twitter is fairly paramount, given CEO Tony Hsieh has revolutionised the manner in which a CEO of a prominent online company interacts with his audience.

On the other hand, if you work in a specialised field, for example as a geophysicist, the networking circle is so narrow that online interaction itself is scarce and beyond this, the highly technical nature of the field, including the jargon-loaded terminology does not lend itself to a social networking environment. Allow me to demonstrate a potential Tweet:

“Made progress on p-wave anisotropic measurements of the Cascadian subduction zone at the transition from the lithosphere to the astenosphere”

Moving right along.

The line becomes a little bit blurry when in a position of dependence, for example the job hunt. It is difficult to ascertain how the hiring company shall perceive the use of Twitter by the potential candidate. This, at the commencement of the recruiting process will depend entirely on the HR Director. If interested in social media networking, a candidate’s presence on Twitter may be an unwritten prerequisite in successfully proceeding to the next stage of the hiring process. However, if the HR Director falls into a more traditional realm in which social media remains a subject that is being tentatively explored, then an active Twitter profile may go unrecognised.

On a side note, if you are in job hunt mode, and are looking to secure a position that in some form or manner involves an understanding of the online marketing industry, you should utilise the social media platforms that are causing a stir in the online market – Twitter being one of them.

If the words ‘social media’ fall anywhere in your job title, it would be advisable to Tweet and perhaps write something insightful for your clients, rather than just sharing news on the shoes you purchased or the restaurant you are currently frequenting – unless your clients are supposed to meet you there!

So, if you think that Twitter is just pointless babble and have no desire to join the noise, do not feel pressured to do so. Having said that, it is difficult to derive value from something that you have not yet tried yourself, so before making any hasty conclusions, the only way to answer ‘To Tweet or not to Tweet?’ is to jump on and give it a shot. Unless you’re a geophysicist, of course.

  • Share/Bookmark